M contents/articles/hex.md → contents/articles/hex.md

@@ -7,3 +7,67 @@ content-type: article
 timestamp: 1734263361
 -----
 
+I have a page on my personal wiki system (which is written in [min](/min) with a [h3](/h3) frontend, and *still* closed-source) titled _Use cases for a new programming language_. The first line I wrote is the following:
+
+> A new programming language should only be created if it helps addressing a specific, practical use case
+
+Right. That was meant to dissuade me to embark in endless quests for creating yet another (pointless?) little language that _probably_ doesn't really solve any practical purpose. I have a bunch of those lying around or even half-designed in my personal wiki, and of course [min](https://min-lang.org) has been my go-to personal project for many years, and I still enjoy tinkering with it.
+
+But...
+
+I still wanted to create a new language. The problem with min is that by emphasizing practicality more and more, it became more of a single-file, batteries included programming language that can be used to create web servers, make HTTPS requests, process XML files, ...things like that.
+
+The syntax also evolved quite a bit to support complex data types, it has sigils and other oddities (bang-postfixed auto-popping symbols, anyone?). And it is also not that small anymore. Well over 1MB on some platforms. It statically links OpenSSL for Heaven's sake.
+
+And it is written in Nim. Because I forgot how to program in C. Sometimes I wish I invested the same amount of time in re-learning C rather than picking a new slightly non-mainstream language to build my ecosystem with. But it's fine, these are not regrets, everything helps shaping up the future, in life.
+
+### Why _hex_?
+
+I wanted to create a language that was:
+
+- Really minimalist in syntax
+- Small in size
+- Cross-platform (compiling to WebAssembly and also [αcτµαlly pδrταblε εxεcµταblε](https://justine.lol/ape.html))
+- Was implemented in C (that was more of a personal thing than anything else, but C ain't going anywhere as a language, at least)
+- Concatenative (I am still fascinated by the concatenative programming paradigm)
+- Able to do basic operations on strings and numbers, and delegate everything else to external programs
+- Able to be used to create shell scripts, used as glue code, etc.
+- It had some quirks. Not many, but _some_ to make it interesting and fun to play with
+- Be easy to learn and useful to learn more about concatenative programming
+
+Then the name. It took me hours of thinking over... weeks to come up with a good name. I then settled with _hex_ because:
+
+- It's short and memorable
+- It has not been used for another programming language yet (go try find 1-3 letter words that are not, you'd be surprised)
+- It has something magical about it (besides thinking about hexadecimal numbers, it also means _spell_ or a curse)
+
+### MVPL (Minimum Viable Programming Language)
+
+Another page of my personal wiki aims at defining what constitutes a _minimum viable programming language_. 
+
+Here's a list of things that I consider _mandatory_:
+
+v integers
+v strings
+v arrays 
+v exec external processes
+v variables
+v define functions 
+v flow control: conditionals, loops
+v error handling
+v file management
+v std io
+
+...and here's a list of things that are _nice to have_:
+
+? floats
+? objects
+? booleans
+? lexical scoping
+? serialization/deserialization
+? regex
+? networking
+? xml
+? json
+
+