all repos — h3rald @ 0188a8ec516ed9ad4778e74ed4dae2b838516907

The sources of https://h3rald.com

AI article updates.
h3rald h3rald@h3rald.com
Sun, 16 Mar 2025 12:12:50 +0100
commit

0188a8ec516ed9ad4778e74ed4dae2b838516907

parent

ccb5657096555ca9f2a8276d221c4b928cdcd665

1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

jump to
M contents/articles/gen-ai.mdcontents/articles/gen-ai.md

@@ -79,6 +79,23 @@ What the actually f***. I mean _seriously_. I really struggled the urge to quote [one of the most insightful rants](https://ludic.mataroa.blog/blog/i-will-fucking-piledrive-you-if-you-mention-ai-again/) on AI I have ever read.

The one thing that is more annoying than AI, is people desperately trying to shove it down your throat. +### Generative AI is not a product + +As a technical product manager myself, I have to frequently deal with AI-generated hype, at all levels: executives want you to put AI in your products, and so do engineers it seems. Everytime anybody comes to me with a proposal to use AI to do something, I ask myself the following questions: + +* Does AI provide any real _value_ to the user? +* Is AI actually making things _faster_ or _easier_ for the user? +* Can I replace the AI integration with something that is _faster_ or _easier_ for the user? +* Is AI solving just one specific aspect of the problem or can it be used to solve the problem _holistically_? + +Unless the answer to at least one of those question is a resounding _yes_, then you have a problem. + +You really cannot sell generative AI by itself: you need a problem to solve, and you need to solve it in a way that actually makes things easier or faster for the user. AI _can_ be a productivity boost, but it cannot replace the product itself. + +Let's go through a couple of examples. + +--> AI augmented documentation searches +--> Generate code for customizations -------