contents/articles/43.html
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 |
-----
title: "Time for a diet..."
content-type: article
timestamp: 1173437940
tags: "cakephp|rant|writing"
-----
<p>My fiancée keeps telling me that too many cakes are not good for me, and I never listen: I always liked cakes!
I <strong>did</strong> like the CakePHP™<sup class="footnote" id="fnr1"><a href="#fn1">1</a></sup> framework
too, once, and I <strong>did</strong> write some articles about it in
the past, and I believe at least a bunch of Bakers found them useful, especially at the time.<br />
I do believe the Cake™ Software Foundation<sup class="footnote" id="fnr1"><a href="#fn1">1</a></sup> quite
liked having their framework featured on popular websites like php|architect and SitePoint, and I believe that I
contributed – to some extent – to make it one of the most popular frameworks available for the <span
class="caps">PHP</span> programming language.</p>
<p>Unfortunately though someone decided that two of such articles and my personal website were no longer worth a mention
on CakePHP official website frontpage. To me, this makes sense since the two CakePHP-related series which are being
published by <span class="caps">IBM</span> are much more up-to-date than my articles, and thus deserve such a
mention instead.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, I took a screenshot of the CakePHP website just yesterday <em>“by chance”</em> and my
articles were still there:</p>
<p><img src="/images/pictures/cake-promo/cakephp-08032007.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>…while this morning they weren't anymore:</p>
<p><img src="/images/pictures/cake-promo/cakephp-09032007.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Of course I can't provide any proof that I took the screenshot yesterday, and of course I don't have any
proof of the fact that someone in <span class="caps">CSF</span> may have thought that due to my recent <a
href="/articles/42/">bad behavior</a> my articles didn't deserve to be publicized anymore. I am confident
that the Cake Software Foundation always does its best in keeping its site up-to-date, and I am glad that
yesterday's accident reminded them that there were far better articles which needed to be featured on their
site. At least I <em>finally</em> did something good for the community!</p>
<p>Sarcasm apart, I feel I owe an apology for blowing this whole thing out of proportions: I disclosed embarassing
details about our past project which – for the sake of the framework – should have never been made
public, perhaps.<br />
I want all of you to know that I still think that CakePHP is the best <span class="caps">PHP</span> framework ever
made and I genuinely think that Larry E. Master did outstanding work in all this time, along with the rest of <span
class="caps">CSF</span> members and contributors. Best of luck for your future editorial and development
projects.</p>
<p>Since now my contributions are no longer “officially recognized”, I think I'd better to move on
devoting my attention to something else.</p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn1"><a href="#fnr1"><sup>1</sup></a> “CakePHP” and “Cake”
<em>seems</em> to be registered trademarks of the Cake Software Foundation Inc. I'm not sure if I'm
allowed to use them in this blog — If anyone has any problem with it, please let me know.
</p>
|