all repos — h3rald @ 6b243ded05a7593922d198634c681075de1c12e2

The sources of https://h3rald.com

contents/articles/rails-inspired-php-frameworks.html

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
 100
 101
 102
 103
 104
 105
 106
 107
 108
 109
 110
 111
 112
 113
 114
 115
 116
 117
 118
 119
 120
 121
 122
 123
 124
 125
 126
 127
 128
 129
 130
 131
 132
 133
 134
 135
 136
 137
 138
 139
 140
 141
 142
 143
 144
 145
 146
 147
 148
 149
 150
 151
 152
 153
 154
 155
 156
 157
 158
 159
 160
 161
 162
 163
 164
 165
 166
 167
 168
 169
 170
 171
 172
 173
 174
 175
 176
 177
 178
 179
 180
 181
 182
 183
 184
 185
 186
 187
 188
 189
 190
 191
 192
 193
 194
 195
 196
 197
 198
 199
 200
 201
 202
 203
 204
 205
 206
 207
 208
 209
 210
 211
 212
 213
 214
 215
 216
 217
 218
 219
 220
 221
 222
 223
 224
 225
 226
 227
 228
 229
 230
 231
 232
 233
 234
 235
 236
 237
 238
 239
 240
 241
 242
 243
 244
 245
 246
 247
 248
 249
 250
 251
 252
 253
 254
 255
 256
 257
 258
 259
 260
 261
 262
 263
 264
 265
 266
 267
 268
 269
 270
 271
 272
 273
 274
 275
 276
 277
 278
 279
 280
 281
 282
 283
 284
 285
 286
 287
 288
 289
 290
 291
 292
 293
 294
 295
 296
 297
 298
 299
 300
 301
 302
 303
 304
 305
 306
 307
 308
 309
 310
 311
 312
 313
 314
 315
 316
 317
 318
 319
 320
 321
 322
 323
 324
 325
 326
 327
 328
 329
 330
 331
 332
 333
 334
 335
 336
 337
 338
 339
 340
 341
 342
 343
 344
 345
 346
 347
 348
 349
 350
 351
 352
 353
 354
 355
 356
 357
 358
 359
-----
title: "Rails-inspired PHP frameworks"
content-type: article
subtitle: "A roundup of six different PHP frameworks inspired by Ruby on Rails"
popular: true
timestamp: 1146661020
tags: "frameworks|review|cakephp|rails"
-----
<p>There are various articles online examining many <span class="caps">PHP</span> frameworks, providing short reviews or
	comparative charts, but I could not find yet an article examining the so called <em>&#8220;Rails-inspired
		frameworks&#8221;</em> anywhere on the web, so I decided to write my own&#8230;</p>
<blockquote>
	<p><strong><span class="caps">IMPORTANT</span> <span class="caps">UPDATE</span>:</strong> I do no longer recommend
		the CakePHP framework anymore due to the <a href=/articles/42">unprofessionalism of some
			member of its development team</a>. My site is now powered by Ruby on Rails and I totally lost interest in
		<span class="caps">PHP</span> and any <span class="caps">PHP</span> framework. If you are looking for a decent
		web framework, try <a href="http://www.rubyonrails.org">Ruby on Rails</a> (for Ruby), <a
			href="http://www.djangoproject.com/">Django</a> (for Python) or <a
			href="http://catalyst.perl.org/">Catalyst</a> (for Perl).<br />
		I'm talking about those <span class="caps">PHP</span> frameworks who give at least part of their success
		to Ruby on Rails<sup class="footnote" id="fnr2"><a href="#fn2">2</a></sup>, but don't call them
		<em>clones</em> or <em>ports</em> as some of their creators may get offended.
	</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="float:left;"><img src="/images/pictures/rails.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Since Rails shocked the world with an easy-to-use, powerful and semi-sentient web development framework, web
	development is not the same anymore: everything must be done efficiently, quickly and you <em>have</em> to produce a
	Web 2.0 compliant public beta after X days/weeks/months or your work is simply not useful to anybody. Try doing that
	with the traditional <span class="caps">PHP</span> spaghetti code: you can't, it's too much, it will be
	too tangled up and in the end you'll lose your mind trying to find that <em>small insignificant bug</em> which
	makes your web application completely useless.</p>
<p>Yes, you could use Rails, but maybe you don't know or don't want to learn Ruby, your host doesn't
	support it, your boss loves <span class="caps">PHP</span> etc. etc. If you're in this situation or you simply
	would like to know what's going on at the <span class="caps">PHP</span> front of the Rails Clone War, you
	should keep reading this article.</p>
<p>I'd like to introduce &#8211; briefly &#8211; six Rails-inspired <span class="caps">PHP</span> frameworks and
	compare them with each other, to point out their features, their pros and cons.</p>
<blockquote>
	<p><em><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> I'm a CakePHP<sup class="footnote" id="fnr3"><a href="#fn3">3</a></sup>
			fan, this site has been built with CakePHP and I even wrote something<sup class="footnote" id="fnr4"><a
					href="#fn4">4</a></sup> about it in the past. This makes me inevitably partial and more familiar
			with this particular framework, but I'll try my very best to provide a relatively objective analysis.
			Obviously frameworks which are not based on the <span class="caps">MVC</span> architechture and that
			weren't inspired by Ruby on Rails have not been included, so forget things like <span
				class="caps">PRADO</span>, Qcodo, eZComponents, or even Mojavi: it's not that they are
			&#8220;bad&#8221;, they've just been left out because they are not pertinent to this article</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h3>CakePHP</h3>
<p style="float:right;"><img src="/images/pictures/CakePHP_1.0.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Website:</strong> <a href="http://www.cakephp.org/">www.cakephp.org</a><br />
	<strong><span class="caps">PHP</span> version:</strong> PHP4 and PHP5<br />
	<strong>License:</strong> <span class="caps">MIT</span><sup class="footnote" id="fnr5"><a
			href="#fn5">5</a></sup><br />
	<strong>Download size (.tar.gz):</strong> 184KB<br />
	<strong>Supported Databases:</strong> MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQlite, MS <span class="caps">SQL</span> + any other
	supported by ADOdb or <span class="caps">PEAR</span>::DB database abstraction layers<br />
	<strong>Beginner's Tutorial</strong>: <a href="http://wiki.cakephp.org/tutorials:blog_tutorial_-_1">Blog
		Tutorial</a>
</p>
<p><strong>Official Description:</strong><br />
	<em>&#8220;Cake is a rapid development framework for <span class="caps">PHP</span> which uses commonly known design
		patterns like ActiveRecord, Association Data Mapping, Front Controller and <span class="caps">MVC</span>. Our
		primary goal is to provide a structured framework that enables <span class="caps">PHP</span> users at all levels
		to rapidly develop robust web applications, without any loss to flexibility.&#8221;</em>
</p>
<p><strong>PROs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Lightweight, not bloated, containing only essential code</li>
	<li>Runs both on PHP4 and PHP5</li>
	<li>No configuration needed &#8211; except for a stupidly short database configuration file and a few constants
		which <em>can</em> be modified. You can literally start baking in less than five minutes</li>
	<li>Extended table association support, allowing the creation of complex database architechtures</li>
	<li>Extremely logical and functional directory structure: better than Rails, if you ask me.</li>
	<li>Enhanced <span class="caps">AJAX</span> support through the <span class="caps">AJAX</span> and Javascript view
		helpers</li>
	<li>useful &#8220;bake&#8221; command line script to generate parts of the code automatically</li>
	<li>Very active community and plenty of <em>satellite sites</em></li>
	<li>Suitable for every kind of website, from the small personal site to the advanced e-business application.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>CONs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>No &#8220;official&#8221; internationalization support for now, but it will be included in the next milestone.
	</li>
	<li>It does not take fully advantage of PHP5 features</li>
	<li>Official documentation still needs some some improvement, although now it seems pretty complete and exhaustive.
	</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Comments:</strong><br />
	CakePHP is my personal favorite: easy to learn, easy to use,multi-purpose and not bloated. Cake's philosophy
	is not to include unnecessary code in the framework unless it's absolutely necessary for the framework itself,
	as a result, 3rd-party libraries are not included in the official releases, but may be seamlessly integrated with
	the framework <em>if developers need them</em>. <br />
	Cake's success is partly determined &#8211; at least initially &#8211; by the fact that it can run fine with
	no limitations on PHP4, while other similar frameworks don't. Although this may still be one of its most
	obvious strengths, it must be said that Cake seems to go in the right direction, taking only the best from Rails,
	without forcing developers into complex and pointless adaptations, and evolving into a great framework created
	<em>in <span class="caps">PHP</span>, for <span class="caps">PHP</span></em>.
</p>
<h3>Symfony</h3>
<p style="float:right;"><img src="/images/pictures/symfony.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Website:</strong> <a href="http://www.symfony-project.com/">www.synfony.project.com</a><br />
	<strong><span class="caps">PHP</span> version:</strong> PHP5<br />
	<strong>License:</strong> Symfony<sup class="footnote" id="fnr6"><a href="#fn6">6</a></sup><br />
	<strong>Download size (.tgz):</strong> 1255KB<br />
	<strong>Supported Databases:</strong> MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Oracle, MS <span class="caps">SQL</span> + any
	other supported by Creole database abstraction layer<br />
	<strong>Beginner's Tutorial</strong>: <a href="http://www.symfony-project.com/tutorial/my_first_project.html">My
		first project</a>
</p>
<p><strong>Official Description:</strong><br />
	<em>&#8220;Based on the best practices of web development, thoroughly tried on several active websites, symfony aims
		to speed up the creation and maintenance of web applications, and to replace the repetitive coding tasks by
		power, control and pleasure. [&#8230;]</em><br />
	<em>Symfony is an object-oriented PHP5 framework based on the <span class="caps">MVC</span> model. Symfony allows
		for the separation of business rules, server logic and presentation views of a web application. It also contains
		numerous tools and classes aimed at shortening the development time of a complex web application.&quot;</em>
</p>
<p><strong>PROs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Fully featured framework, includes everything you might ever need (see CONs, below)</li>
	<li>Full native internationalization support</li>
	<li>Truly excellent documentation, tutorials, wiki, book, screencasts, <span class="caps">API</span>, real-world
		examples, etc. etc.</li>
	<li>Code generators</li>
	<li>Various &#8220;pre-built&#8221; modules/libraries for the most common tasks</li>
	<li>It was not inspired only by Rails, but borrows concepts and practices from various other frameworks</li>
	<li>Good community support</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>CONs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Seems too big compared to the others, too many &#8220;extras&#8221; which may not be useful to <em>all</em>
		developers</li>
	<li>PHP5 only</li>
	<li>Confusing and disorganized directory structure</li>
	<li>Uses too many configuration files, not suitable for <em>simple</em> projects</li>
	<li>Steep learning curve</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Comments:</strong><br />
	Symfony is really an interesting framework: it's perhaps the most <em>complete</em> in terms for features and
	documentation. The only problem I have with it is that it just seems too complex and rather difficult to learn if
	compared to the others, which can do <em>almost</em> the same things (or will soon be able to) in a <em><span
			class="caps">MUCH</span></em> simpler way. A nice blend of <span class="caps">MVC</span>, pre-built
	components, command line generators and <span class="caps">YAML</span>/Propel configuration files, but perhaps a bit
	<em>disorganized</em> in its internal structure, unlike its wonderful documentation and support section.
</p>
<h3><span class="caps">PHP</span> on Trax</h3>
<p style="float:right;"><img src="/images/pictures/phpontrax.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Website:</strong> <a href="http://www.phpontrax.com/">www.phpontrax.com</a><br />
	<strong><span class="caps">PHP</span> version:</strong> PHP5<br />
	<strong>License:</strong> <span class="caps">MIT</span><br />
	<strong>Download size (.tgz):</strong> 843KB<br />
	<strong>Supported Databases:</strong> Any database supported by <span class="caps">PEAR</span>::DB<br />
	<strong>Beginner's Tutorial</strong>: <a href="http://svn.phpontrax.com/wiki/HowToCreateATraxApplication">How
		to create a Trax application</a>
</p>
<p><strong>Official Description:</strong><br />
	<em>&#8220;Php On Trax (formerly Php On Rails) is a web-application and persistance framework that is based on Ruby
		on Rails and includes everything needed to create database-backed web-applications according to the
		Model-View-Control pattern of separation.&#8221;</em>
</p>
<p><strong>PROs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Simple, logical, essential: a true RoR port to PHP5</li>
	<li>Code generators, like Rails</li>
	<li>Zero configuration (like Rails and Cake</li>
	<li>Easy and logical directory structure (the same as Rails)</li>
	<li>Supports table associations, but more in a way which is more similar to Ruby on Rails than Cake.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>CONs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Lack of documentation compared to the others</li>
	<li>Trying to port Ruby on Rails to <span class="caps">PHP</span>, ignoring why RoR was not built in <span
			class="caps">PHP</span> in the first place<sup class="footnote" id="fnr7"><a href="#fn7">7</a></sup></li>
	<li>No internationalization or other advanced functionalities</li>
	<li>PHP5 only</li>
	<li>Small community</li>
	<li><span class="caps">DBO</span> class based only on <span class="caps">PEAR</span>::DB</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Comments:</strong><br />
	In my opinion this project aims too much to be a Rails-clone to acquire a proper consensus. Trying to port something
	to another language is not good, especially in the case of Rails and Ruby. This framework looks somehow like an old
	version of CakePHP, which evolved slightly but always remained anchored to its beliefs of building a Rails port for
	<span class="caps">PHP</span> (even in the name!). Some may say that this is a lost battle since the beginning
	&#8211; or better, since before it started &#8211; but others found that <span class="caps">PHP</span> on Trax can
	be the easiest way to switch from Ruby on Rails to a <span class="caps">PHP</span> equivalent. Who is going to do
	that? Well, Ruby programmers <em>forced</em> to develop in <span class="caps">PHP</span>, maybe. Not too good, but
	not too bad either.
</p>
<h3>Code Igniter</h3>
<p style="float:right;"><img src="/images/pictures/codeigniter.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Website:</strong> <a href="http://www.codeigniter.com/">www.codeigniter.org</a><br />
	<strong><span class="caps">PHP</span> version:</strong> PHP4 and PHP5<br />
	<strong>License:</strong> CodeIgniter<sup class="footnote" id="fnr8"><a href="#fn8">8</a></sup><br />
	<strong>Download size (.zip):</strong> 609KB<br />
	<strong>Supported Databases:</strong> MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, MySQLi, MS <span class="caps">SQL</span> + <span
		class="caps">ODBC</span><br />
	<strong>Beginner's Tutorial</strong>: <a href="http://www.codeigniter.com/videos/ci_intro.mov">Hello World!
		Introduction to Code Igniter</a> [video]
</p>
<p><strong>Official Description:</strong><br />
	<em>&#8220;Code Igniter is an Open Source Web Application Framework that makes writing kick-ass <span
			class="caps">PHP</span> programs simple as apple pie. [&#8230;] Designed to enable, not overwhelm, Code
		Igniter is a powerful <span class="caps">PHP</span> framework with a very small footprint, built for <span
			class="caps">PHP</span> coders who need a simple and elegant toolkit to create full-featured web
		applications.</em><br />
	<em>If you're a developer who lives in the real world of shared hosting accounts and clients with deadlines,
		and if you're tired of ponderously large and thoroughly undocumented frameworks that require rocket
		science to understand, Code Igniter might just be the right tool for you.&quot;</em>
</p>
<p><strong>PROs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Good and organized documentation</li>
	<li>Zero configuration (like Rails and Cake)</li>
	<li>Includes various classes and libraries for common tasks</li>
	<li>Compatible with PHP4 and PHP5</li>
	<li>Medium-sized community</li>
	<li>Intuitive directory structure</li>
	<li>Ships with the full user guide included in separate <span class="caps">HTML</span> files</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>CONs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>No full (&#8220;written&#8221;) tutorials except the videos!</li>
	<li>Relatively new to the scene, but growing</li>
	<li>Does not seem to support table associations.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Comments:</strong><br />
	People on the Net seem to be rather enthusiastic about this framework: where there's a thread about the
	<em>big ones</em> (Cake and Symfony), there's always, someone who pops in suggesting to try out Code Igniter.
	I personally think this can be a true bless for small/medium sized projects, however, I'd opt for CakePHP or
	Symfony for a large scale application: something is missing, e.g., most notably, table associations.
</p>
<h3>Biscuit</h3>
<p style="float:right;"><img src="/images/pictures/biscuit.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Website:</strong> <a href="http://biscuitproject.tigris.org/">biscuitproject.tigris.org</a><br />
	<strong><span class="caps">PHP</span> version:</strong> PHP4 and PHP5<br />
	<strong>License:</strong> <span class="caps">MIT</span><sup class="footnote" id="fnr5"><a href="#fn5">5</a></sup>
	<br />
	<strong>Download size (.zip):</strong> 240KB<br />
	<strong>Supported Databases:</strong> Any database supported by <span class="caps">PEAR</span>::DB<br />
	<strong>Beginner's Tutorial</strong>: <a href="http://bennolan.com/biscuit/tutorial.html">Creating a simple
		application using the Biscuit <span class="caps">MVC</span> framework</a>
</p>
<p><strong>Official Description:</strong><br />
	<em>&#8220;The mission of this project is to port Ruby on Rails to PHP5 (minus the Ruby part ;-)&#8221;</em>
</p>
<p><strong>PROs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Zero configuration, easy to deploy</li>
	<li>Runs both on PHP4 and PHP5</li>
	<li>Simple to learn</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>CONs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Still under development and incomplete</li>
	<li>Offers a limited subset of the features and functionalities offered by competitors: no internationalization, no
		table associations, no scaffolding&#8230;</li>
	<li><em>&#8220;Documentation coming soon&#8221;</em></li>
	<li>Almost non-existent community</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Comments:</strong><br />
	This project started as an attempt to create something simpler than CakePHP and more similar to Rails. I'm not
	sure whether the project is still active or not, since the last &#8220;release&#8221; on the former's
	developer site is dated August 2005. Still in early stage &#8211; or dead.</p>
<h3>Pipeline</h3>
<p style="float:right;"><img src="/images/pictures/livepipe.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Website:</strong> <a href="http://livepipe.net/pipeline/">livepipe.net/pipeline/</a><br />
	<strong><span class="caps">PHP</span> version:</strong> PHP5<br />
	<strong>License:</strong> Pipeline<sup class="footnote" id="fnr9"><a href="#fn9">9</a></sup><br />
	<strong>Download size (.zip):</strong> 288KB<br />
	<strong>Supported Databases:</strong> SQLite<br />
	<strong>Beginner's Tutorial</strong>: none
</p>
<p><strong>PROs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>Simple directory structure</li>
	<li>Suitable for small projects</li>
	<li>Comes with various ready-made components</li>
	<li>Supports table relationships</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>CONs:</strong></p>
<ul>
	<li>PHP5-only</li>
	<li>Too restrictive: only SQLite supported, <em>kindly suggests</em> developers to use its built-in features only
	</li>
	<li>No documentation or tutorials, just the <span class="caps">API</span></li>
	<li>Not suitable for large projects</li>
	<li>Almost non-existent community</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Comments:</strong><br />
	This project mainly borrowed the <span class="caps">MVC</span> architecture and some basic concepts from Rails,
	creating a simple PHP5 framework with personal/small websites in mind: it offers various built-in components which
	can be handy to most of us, supports <em>only</em> SQLite, and basically tells developers what to do. In my opinion
	it's not flexible enough to be compared to the others, and it's simply not suitable for anything other
	than small websites.</p>
<h3>Conclusions</h3>
<p>My favorite framework still remains CakePHP, it's simple and yet powerful, easy to learn and use, mature, well
	supported and continuously improving. Symfony &#8211; at the moment &#8211; seems to be the one with most features
	and the best documentation, and it is an excellent and well supported project. The only problem I have with it is
	the scary amount of configuration files necessary to create an application: CakePHP doesn't need any and can
	be used for (almost?) equally complex projects.<br />
	Although I didn't have a chance to try them out, <span class="caps">PHP</span> on Trax is certainly the most
	faithful port of Ruby on Rails to <span class="caps">PHP</span>, but it lacks some of the features CakePHP and
	Symfony offer. Code Igniter may not be as advanced as the others, but its community seems to grow and its simplicity
	may appeal more users in the future&#8230;</p>
<p>At any rate, developers should <em>always</em> choose the best framework for their needs: I tried to write a quick
	comparative analysis of these six Rails' &#8220;<span class="caps">PHP</span> children&#8221;, now it's
	<em>your</em> turn, try out some of them, if you choose wisely you won't be disappointed.
</p>
<h3>Notes</h3>
<p class="footnote" id="fn1"><a href="#fnr1"><sup>1</sup></a> They are all distributed according to various Open Source
	licenses.</p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn2"><a href="#fnr2"><sup>2</sup></a> <a href="http://www.rubyonrails.org">Ruby on Rails</a>
	&#8211; Ruby framework for web development</p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn3"><a href="#fnr3"><sup>3</sup></a> <a href="http://www.cakephp.org">CakePHP</a> &#8211; Rapid
	[<span class="caps">PHP</span>] Development Framework</p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn4"><a href="#fnr4"><sup>4</sup></a> <a href="/articles/cakephp">CakePHP &#8211; A
		&#8216;tasty' solution for <span class="caps">PHP</span> programming</a>, originally published on <a
		href="http://www.zzine.org/articles/cakephp">zZine Magazine</a></p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn5"><a href="#fnr5"><sup>5</sup></a> Open Source <a
		href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php"><span class="caps">MIT</span> License</a>.</p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn6"><a href="#fnr6"><sup>6</sup></a> Symfony License:<br />
	<small><br />
		<blockquote><br />
			Copyright &#169; 2004-2006 Fabien Potencier<br />
			Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated
			documentation files (the &#8220;Software&#8221;), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
			without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
			copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the
			following conditions:
</p>
<p>The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
	Software.</p>
<p><span class="caps">THE</span> <span class="caps">SOFTWARE</span> IS <span class="caps">PROVIDED</span> &#8220;AS
	IS&#8221;, <span class="caps">WITHOUT</span> <span class="caps">WARRANTY</span> OF <span class="caps">ANY</span>
	<span class="caps">KIND</span>, <span class="caps">EXPRESS</span> OR <span class="caps">IMPLIED</span>, <span
		class="caps">INCLUDING</span> <span class="caps">BUT</span> <span class="caps">NOT</span> <span
		class="caps">LIMITED</span> TO <span class="caps">THE</span> <span class="caps">WARRANTIES</span> OF <span
		class="caps">MERCHANTABILITY</span>, <span class="caps">FITNESS</span> <span class="caps">FOR</span> A <span
		class="caps">PARTICULAR</span> <span class="caps">PURPOSE</span> <span class="caps">AND</span> <span
		class="caps">NONINFRINGEMENT</span>. IN NO <span class="caps">EVENT</span> <span class="caps">SHALL</span> <span
		class="caps">THE</span> <span class="caps">AUTHORS</span> OR <span class="caps">COPYRIGHT</span> <span
		class="caps">HOLDERS</span> BE <span class="caps">LIABLE</span> <span class="caps">FOR</span> <span
		class="caps">ANY</span> <span class="caps">CLAIM</span>, <span class="caps">DAMAGES</span> OR <span
		class="caps">OTHER</span> <span class="caps">LIABILITY</span>, <span class="caps">WHETHER</span> IN AN <span
		class="caps">ACTION</span> OF <span class="caps">CONTRACT</span>, <span class="caps">TORT</span> OR <span
		class="caps">OTHERWISE</span>, <span class="caps">ARISING</span> <span class="caps">FROM</span>, <span
		class="caps">OUT</span> OF OR IN <span class="caps">CONNECTION</span> <span class="caps">WITH</span> <span
		class="caps">THE</span> <span class="caps">SOFTWARE</span> OR <span class="caps">THE</span> <span
		class="caps">USE</span> OR <span class="caps">OTHER</span> <span class="caps">DEALINGS</span> IN <span
		class="caps">THE</span> <span class="caps">SOFTWARE</span>.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p></small></p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn7"><a href="#fnr7"><sup>7</sup></a> Read the comments by David Heinemeier Hansson on <a
		href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/archives/000606.php">Ruby on Rails to Basecamp</a></p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn8"><a href="#fnr8"><sup>8</sup></a> CodeIgniter <a
		href="http://www.codeigniter.com/user_guide/license.html">License Agreement</a></p>
<p class="footnote" id="fn9"><a href="#fnr9"><sup>9</sup></a> Pipeline is licensed under the same terms as the Symfony
	framework [Copyright &#169; 2006 Picora Pipeworks <span class="caps">LLC</span>].</p>