all repos — h3rald @ 33455297d89b82345dd2e74a6e57567bbf73b20f

The sources of https://h3rald.com

content/articles/10-reasons-why-i-didnt-update-my-blog.textile

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
 10
 11
 12
 13
 14
 15
 16
 17
 18
 19
 20
 21
 22
 23
 24
 25
 26
 27
 28
 29
 30
 31
 32
 33
 34
 35
 36
 37
 38
 39
 40
 41
 42
 43
 44
 45
 46
 47
 48
 49
 50
 51
 52
 53
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59
 60
 61
 62
 63
 64
 65
 66
 67
 68
 69
 70
 71
 72
 73
 74
 75
 76
 77
 78
 79
 80
 81
 82
 83
 84
 85
 86
 87
 88
 89
 90
 91
 92
 93
 94
 95
 96
 97
 98
 99
 100
 101
 102
 103
 104
 105
 106
 107
 108
 109
 110
 111
 112
 113
 114
 115
 116
 117
 118
 119
 120
 121
 122
 123
 124
 125
 126
 127
 128
 129
 130
 131
 132
 133
 134
 135
 136
 137
 138
 139
 140
 141
 142
 143
 144
 145
 146
 147
----- 
permalink: 10-reasons-why-i-didnt-update-my-blog
filters_pre: 
- redcloth
title: 10 reasons why I didn't update my blog
comments: 
- :date: 2008-10-09 01:44:25 +02:00
  :author: tcd
  :url: ""
  :id: 265
  :body: |-
    Feeling guilty is stupid, IMHO. One should be free to do whatever s/he wishes to do with his/her OWN blog. 
    
    Dammit, *you* are the owner of this blog. :)
    
    It is NOT the blog owning you! :p
    
    I have a blog that gets updated irregularly, with a lot of postponing behind the scenes, but I usually don't waste time in pondering about all those points you've highlighted in your post.
    
    I just write in it whenever I have something I _really_ want to write. :)
    
    Blogging should be a pleasure, not a via crucis :p
    
    (apologies about double or triple copies of this comment: had noscript activated LOL)
- :date: 2008-10-09 02:41:58 +02:00
  :author: Fabio Cevasco
  :url: http://www.h3rald.com/
  :id: 266
  :body: |-
    Yep, you're definitely right, and if you notice, my blog is _still_ updated irregularly.
    
    It was a rant about not being able to keep up with "mainstream" blogs: my blog is not "optimized" for a particular audience interested on a specific subject. 
    
    I gave up on that when I got upset with the whole CakePHP thing, and I noticed that the minute I stopped being a "CakePHP blog" the number of visitors significantly dropped.  
    
    Nowadays... well, I'm just like you I guess: I write only when I have the time to write and when I have something _significant_ to write about almost any subject.
    
    Unfortunately sometimes I do end up feeling guilty about not writing though, but let's say I'm slowly improving...
date: 2008-06-12 03:30:00 +02:00
tags: 
- internet
- rant
- personal
- writing
type: article
toc: true
-----
_"It has been a while since my last post, sorry about that"_
I read this sentence (or something along those lines) on many blogs on the Internet, including mine. As a matter of fact, I actually didn't write a meaningful post on my blog for a long time and no, probably this is not going to change that either. 

Yesterday I started thinking *why* this happens, not only to me but to a lot of other non-professional bloggers. A professional blogger &emdash; for what I can tell &emdash; is someone like Michael Arrington or Gina Trapani: someone who has the luck (or course) to be able to just blog for a living.

I don't blog for a living: my site is self-sustaining via a few very unobtrusive ads, just that. I have a full time job, and I blog in my spare time about my interests, without even trying to make "proper" money from my site. There's nothing wrong with it: I believe there are some other people in my condition, and that's quite normal.

That being said, let's examine the ten most common reasons why I (and you too, maybe) end up not updating my blog, _even when I have time to do so_.h3. Someone already blogged about it

This is very irritating. I am obsessed with original content. I want to write about something other people _never_ (or hardly ever) wrote about. As a consequence, I often find myself googling the same topic I'm planning my blog post on, and I _obviously_ often get quite a few results, too!

I actually wanted to title this very post "The Blogger's Block", but I immediately thought of putting that very title into Google, just to see if someone else already blogged about it. Sure they did! Not original at all, tough luck. 
It also happened a few weeks ago: I wanted to write about the current state of tech news sites and Antonio Cangiano comes up with a similar "post":http://antoniocangiano.com/2008/05/29/random-thoughts-on-social-sites/. Very interesting indeed, but quite annoying as well!

OK scrap that, think about something else... 

This can potentially go on for days, and the only solution is of course trying not to worry about it, and just write the damn thing (that's what I did to write this post).

h3. I didn't research enough on the subject

This happens tipically with reviews, round-ups, etc. Things I actually enjoy writing, but which may be easily subject to (harsh) criticism unless ou do them right. 
I wanted to write a review of the new Treo 750 I bought. I've been using for a while, I learnt a few interesting hacks etc. etc. Unfortunately the 3G iPhone came out, so everyone is all hyped up about it. Too bad that I, being Italian and living in Italy, I never actually touched the damn thing!
What has that got to do with my Treo 750? Well, it would be nice to write a review of a Windows Mobile 6 phone comparing to the upcoming Apple wonder, wouldn't it?

The solution to this would be trying to limit the scope of your post: screw Apple, let's just focus on my Treo 750 and on the amazing amount of programming languages I can use on it! 

h3. After researching for X days, I realized it was all a waste of time

This happens with big articles. I once thought about writing a comprehensive article about all the possible ways to deploy a Ruby on Rails web site. Cool, isn't it? I started researching about all the most esoteric lightweight web servers, about JRuby, Glassfish, IronRuby, ... A lot of things. And new solutions kept coming up, and with them more and more posts, and then even entire books on the subjects.

Very frustrating. I abandoned the whole thing, because there was simply no reason to go on researching: it was all a waste of time.

How to fix this? Again, reduce the scope of your article so that you are able to reduce the time you spend researching about it. Or maybe try to get paid to write it, so that even if there's plenty of articles about the same subject, at least you have a concrete purpose to write yours.

Erhm, yes, by the way, keep an eye on "SitePoint":http://www.sitepoint.com in the next few days/weeks, OK?

h3. I only write when I'm inspired, and now I'm not

Very, very common. I normally think about a very cool article to write in the evening, or early in the morning, or whenever I don't have access to a computer or the Internet. 
Of course I don't forget about it, but by the time I have a chance to actually write it, I really don't fancy doing so. Oh, the irony! 
It happened today, actually, during my lunch break: I was supposed to write this post but I didn't feel like it. I lost my inspiration and all my artistic verve, so no, it can't be done. Tough luck, wait until next time.

How did I solve this? Well, I started writing the post in my coffee break: there was no way to finish it in time, of course, but at least I started it.
I also saved it to my PDA and continued writing it when I had a chance. Eventually, I managed to finish it during my lunch break, the next day.

Try to write _whenever you are inspired_. If you are not inspired in your lunch break, do some work in your lunch break and then write when, in an hour or so, probably, you feel like writing again.

h3. This won't make Digg's front page

Digg, Reddit, DZone, you name it. They are all excellent free tools for promoting your content. Don't tell me you never wrote a post _for the sake of making the front page_ of one of those sites. I did, I confess.
I didn't make Digg's front page in a while, and I'm probably never going to make it again. The reason? When it comes to promoting the right content in a fair way Digg *sucks*. As a consequence, 80% of the articles which appear on Digg *suck*. I'm sure you'll be able to forgive my French when I say that *Digg utterly sucks*.

No matter how clever your story may be, unless you're backed up by a swarm or an active community willing to Digg your story, you simply aren't going to make it. When is the last time a proper programming article made it to Digg? I don't remember, probably way before I unsubscribed to the Digg's Technology feed, about a year or so ago.

Just write for the sake of writing. Don't even submit your story to Digg (unless you're writing about the iPhone, of course, then you may have a chance): post it to a less-known site, maybe, or to Reddit, instead. You won't get as much traffic, granted, but you also won't get tons of idiots writing pointless crap on your site and you won't risk a server crash. If it's destiny, then some good soul will post it to Digg, but nobody will digg it. That's just life, I'm afraid.

h3. It has been too long since my last post: the next one will have to make up for it

This happens when you start feeling guilty because you didn't post in a long time. 

_"My next post is going to be superb, long, interesting and everyone will start flocking back to my blog!"_

Wrong. First of all because statistically people just don't "flock back" because you bestowed them of one interesting post (you have to keep up, too), and second because by doing so your mind will automatically discard all those bits of things you wanted to write about, but you never did because you're waiting for that special _next post_ which will be _so much better_ and will bring your blob back to -spam- life.

It happened, it happened... again, all you have to do is just post all the tidbits you need, while you're preparing your big shot: your blog will remain "fresh" and more people will enjoy your interesting posts, whenever they'll come.

h3. Nobody gives a damn, anyway

I didn't want to upset my younger audience by using a nasty f-word in the title, but that's exactly how it feels like it, sometimes.
I went to Rome last week, did you know? I twittered about it, you *ought* to know! And of course you'll all be waiting for the usual 10-page-long article on my awesome vacation. Like when I "went to London":http://www.h3rald.com/articles/incomplete-guide-to-london, remember?
No, sadly not everyone may be interested in this crap. So I probably won't post about it: who cares? When you start thinking like this, you may stop posting for weeks: not everyone may be interested in everything you post, and I believe that's normal.
Especially for a blog like mine, which is deliberately open to all my interests: programming, technology, travelling, etc. That's why most blogs try to be themed: they write about a particular subject, even a single programming project, and they (try to) do it well. The trade-off is that a themed blog may run out of posts amazingly quickly, if you're not carefula and if you're not 100% devoted to your blog's theme. 
A themed blog will build up a faithful audience, like when I was writing almost exclusively about CakePHP: a lot of PHP programmers where flocking here daily. Then things "went wrong":http://www.h3rald.com/blog/42 and I really couldn't be bothered to write about the same crap. Which leads us to the next topic...

h3. If I write about this, a large chunk of my audience is going to be upset

This applies especially to themed blogs: if you're a well-known Firefox addict, you can't suddenly start writing about "Opera":http://www.h3rald.com/articles/firefox-lovers-guide-to-opera, praising its speed and the features it offers out-of-the box!
If you take a side, you'd better stick to it, if you want your audience to stick to you: the ten people who happen to read this blog are probably quite shocked by the amount of times I "changed side": from CakePHP and PHP to Rails and Ruby, from Firefox to Opera (well, wait until my next SitePoint article comes out, at least...). Probably they are not the same people who read this blog a year or so ago. 

In the end, it's entirely up to you: if you are prone to radically change our opinion (and this happen in technology, much more than in politics), which involves changing the whole theme of your blog, maybe you should consider not having a themed blog at all. 
And if you don't feel 100% sure you want a themed blog, you definitely shouldn't go for a themed domain name, or you may end up abandoning it afterwards. And when that happens, unless you're writing damn cool posts like "Why":http://redhanded.hobix.com/, it's going to hurt your audience. On the other hand, if you're sure you'll get ten times more visitors, go for it.
No, h3rald.com stays... I may end up raving about Safari at some point within the next ten years though, don't be upset!

h3. I'm not an expert on the subject, so I shouldn't blog about it 

This is a common problem I have when I try to write about something I don't know extensively enough. When I started to learn Ruby, I was eager to start writing about it: it seemed just too cool to be true!
I thought about writing a longish post on learning Ruby from scratch, but then I realized it wouldn't have been a great idea: I was just starting to learn a new language, I didn't know all the nitty-gritty and writing about it to teach others was going to be a bit presumptuous, maybe!
Instead, I opted for a lighted "10 reasons to learn Ruby":http://www.h3rald.com/articles/10-reasons-to-learn-ruby article, clearly stating in the first paragraph that I was just a noob getting excited about his new toy. It worked, actually: people seemed to enjoy it, and I was partially excused for the few mistakes I made here and there.
You don't have to be an expert to blog about something: you just have to be totally honest about what you know, and what you don't know.

h3. There are a lot of professional bloggers out there, and I'm not one of them

Finally, this can be summarized in two words: inferiority complex. "Proper" blogs fire out 10+ posts _per day_, and I don't even write ten points in _a month_! Again, those a professional bloggers: they live for blogging (and make an awful lot of money out of it), and they most likely have someone else blogging for them, too! 
Think of TechCrunch or LifeHacker, for example: they have a small legion of talented writers working for them &emdash; even if Michael Harrington does rant about Twitter about three times a week himself, though.
At the end of the day, what matters is the _quality_ of your posts. Not the length minf, the Quality. I personally think that non-professionals (I said "non-professionals", not "amateurs"!) are _allowed_ to write about once a week, if they can provide good content, that is.

But you still do have to write _at least_ once a week (OK, let's make it ten days), otherwise either you're justified (you genuinely don't have time) or you may be a victim of one of these common fears. Watch out, and happy blogging!