content/articles/concatenative-020.textile
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 |
----- permalink: concatenative-020 filters_pre: - erb - redcloth title: Concatenative 0.2.0 released comments: [] date: 2009-04-19 09:42:00 +02:00 tags: - ruby - concatenative type: article toc: true ----- Version 0.2.0. of the "Concatenative":/concatenative DSL has been "released":http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=8068&release_id=33575. Here are some highlights from the changelog: * Implemented new combinators: ** binrec ** split ** twodip ** threedip * Performance improvements: ** Stack is never copied. ** No symbol/string conversion when processing words. * Pseudo-namespace support (e.g. :kernel/:while and :math/:factorial) * ~ and <= operators to unquote and define words, respectively. * No more uppercase words! Oddly enough, I realized that it is possible to defined methods named after reserved words like "while" or "if", so now all the concatenative words (combinators) in @kernel.rb@ are now defined _without_ a leading undersore. Similarly, there's no real need to use UPPERCASE symbols, so as a result, method lookup is significantly faster and will use less resources. Here's how the lookup works. Say you have the following program: <% highlight :ruby do %> [[1,2,3], [4.5.6], :concat] <% end %> If @:concat@ has been defined by the user (@:concat <= [...]@), that definition will be used, otherwise the @Concatenative::Kernel@ combinator @concat@ will be called. If you want to use the corresponding Ruby method, all you have to do is specifying the arity explicitly using the @|@ operator. To remove any ambiguity, it is now possible to specify the _namespace_ of a word explicitly, e.g. :kernel/:concat or :ruby/concat. The @/@ operator simply concatenates the two symbols together (@:"kernel/concat"@) and sets the namespace (@:kernel@) and name (@:concat@) of the new symbol. @:kernel@ and @:ruby@ are not meant to be used when defining new words, but you can use anything else you like, for example :math/:factorial or :local/:a, etc. As I pointed out in the "first article":/articles/concatenative-programming-in-ruby about concatenative, even with the new performance improvement a concatenative program still runs slower than a standard Ruby program, but at least now you won't run out of stack space (the _Ruby_ stack, in this case) too soon. If you have any issues to report, feature requests, etc., feel free to use "GitHub":http://github.com/h3rald/concatenative/issues to do so. |